Eight-micrometer sections were interrogated with anti-maize PIN a

Eight-micrometer sections were interrogated with anti-maize PIN antibodies [55] at a 1/150

dilution and anti-BIP2 (Agrisera) at a 1/50 dilution. DyLight 594 and DyLight 405 were used as secondary antibodies at a 1/300 dilution. pin disruptants were generated and screened for insertion as described in Supplemental Information. GUS staining was carried out as elsewhere [32]. Light micrographs were compiled using a Keyence VHX-1000 series microscope with 50× Talazoparib ic50 and 200× objectives. Confocal imaging was undertaken as previously described [61], except for immunolocalizations; a Leica TCS 5 was used, with excitation from the Diode 405 and HeNe 594 laser lines, and emission was collected at 410–480 nm and 600–670 nm. E.L.D., R.R., and C.J.H. conceived this study. All authors contributed to experimental design. Foundational experiments were undertaken by T.A.B., M.M.L., T.A., N.M.B., M.B., X.Y.W., C.D.W., and C.J.H., with

supervision from E.L.D., R.R., and C.J.H. T.A.B. contributed Figures 6B–6D, S1C, and S2B; M.M.L. contributed Figures 5B and 5C; Y.C. contributed Figure 7B; T.A. contributed Figures S4G and S4H; R.J.D. contributed Figures S1D, S2A, and S5; E.L.D. contributed Figure S4A; C.D.W. HIF-1 activation contributed Figure S4B; X.Y.W. contributed Figure S4F; and C.J.H. contributed the remainder. T.A.B., M.M.L., T.A., R.J.D., E.L.D., R.R., and C.J.H. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. The final manuscript was drafted by C.J.H., with help from T.A.B., T.A., E.L.D., and R.R. C.J.H. handled submission. D.O. contributed anti-PIN antibodies and technical help with immunohistochemistry. We thank James Lloyd for a preliminary experiment. We thank Gertrud Wiedemann

and Anna Beike for initial expression analyses and Ingrid Heger and Agnes Novakovic for technical assistance. We thank Jane Langdale and David Baulcombe for comments on the manuscript. C.J.H. is supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship, a Gatsby Charitable Foundation Fellowship (GAT2962), and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/L00224811), and R.R. is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP 1067, RE 837/6) and the Excellence Initiative of the buy Gefitinib German Federal and State Governments (EXC294). “
“The apparent age of others is widely recognized to modulate our social reactions and expectations [1, 2 and 3]. The ability to accurately estimate chronological age from the face varies with one’s own age and age disparity with the observed person (the “own-age bias” [4, 5 and 6]). We directly investigated the psychological basis of this effect by examining the mental representations of age in younger and older participants. We used an innovative application of reverse correlation [7, 8, 9, 10 and 11] to characterize the mental representations [12 and 13] of six younger (18–25 years old) and six older (56–75 years old) participants.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>