Shark bycatch on FADs is almost exclusively composed of two speci

Shark bycatch on FADs is almost exclusively composed of two species; silky sharks Carcharhinus falciformis and oceanic white tip sharks Carcharhinus longimanus, together comprising over 90% of the shark bycatch by number [21]. As with many sharks, these species have slow growth rates, mature late and have long reproductive cycles with few offspring, and as such are highly susceptible to population decline from excessive fishing pressure [22]. FADs in particular are also associated with the mortality of sharks and turtles through entanglement buy NLG919 with the net hanging beneath a raft (i.e. ghost fishing), although the extent of this mortality

is not usually estimated [23]. The reason for the natural aggregation of tunas beneath floating objects is not entirely clear although the two most credible explanations for this behaviour are the meeting point hypothesis [24] and the indicator-log hypothesis [19]. The meeting point hypothesis suggests that fish associate with

floating objects to facilitate schooling behaviour and subsequently benefit from this social interaction whilst the indicator-log hypothesis suggests that natural floating objects are indicators of productive habitat given that they originate from nutrient-rich areas (e.g. river mouths, mangrove swamps) and subsequently drift with these patches of productivity into the ocean. Given these possible explanations for the association of tunas with floating objects there is concern that the deployment of large numbers CH5424802 cell line of FADs in the pelagic ocean could change the natural environment of tunas, a theory known as the ‘ecological trap hypothesis’ [25] and [26]. Large numbers of floating objects could potentially modify the movement patterns of tunas and carry associated schools in ecologically unsuitable areas and thus affect their growth rate or increase ZD1839 manufacturer natural mortality and/or predation [26] and [27]. Although this subject has received considerable

research attention, it is difficult to evaluate the impacts of FADs on the ecology of tunas, largely due to uncertainty in how tunas interact with floating objects (e.g. length of association, reasons for joining/leaving an object). Consequently the ecological trap hypothesis remains open to discussion [5] and [9]. FADs have had a strong influence in shaping the spatial dynamics of the purse seine fishery. Floating objects are not distributed evenly throughout the western Indian Ocean and their location at any given time is determined largely by surface currents and winds. Floating logs and branches generally originate from large rivers and mangrove systems and drift with the currents throughout the coastal waters and potentially further offshore. This natural flotsam, which has always been a part of the ocean habitat of tuna, accumulates at particularly high densities in the Mozambique Channel where numerous river systems wash debris into the ocean [28].

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>