21, who found that IL-12 but not IFN-α enhances human CD8+ T-cell effector functions as promoted by CD3/CD28-triggering. These authors added recombinant IL-2 to the cultures and neutralizing mAb against IL-4, IL-12 and IFN-γ that may have masked the immunostimulatory properties of IFN-α. The induction of genes coding for effectors proteins suggests that IFN-α may also control the expression of transcription factors
involved in CD8+ T-cell differentiation 22. Recently Mescher’s group has shown that both IL-12 and IFN-α enhance the expression of T-bet, Eomes and blimp-1 coding genes in OT1 cells 14. However, we observed that whereas CD3/CD28-triggering regulates the expression of T-bet, EPZ-6438 datasheet bcl-6, Id2 and blimp-1, IFN-α does not exert any marked effect on the expression of these genes. We do not have any transcriptional data about Eomes, since Eomes is not represented on the HG-U133A 2.0 array. The heterogeneity in human population and different expression kinetics are likely involved in this discrepancy between human and mouse studies. The group of Mescher has also reported that several genes coding for TNF receptors, such as
CD27, OX40, 4-1BB and GITR, are regulated by IFN-α-derived type-3 signals in OT1 cells 14, 23. However, we did not observe any transcriptional effect of IFN-α on the expression of these molecules by human CD8+ T cells, suggesting species-related differences. We also show that IFN-α-derived signal-3 enhances IFN-γ production as well as Granzyme-B- and TRAIL-mediated cytotoxicity both in naïve and memory CD8+ T cells, although naïve CD8+ T cells learn more are more dependent on IFN-α. The relative IFN-I independence of memory CD8+ T cells could be related to the ready state of their TCR signaling machinery 24. With regard to the effector subset, IFN-α enhances IFN-γ production and TRAIL-mediated cytotoxicity of CD45RA+/−CD27− effector CTL. This is an interesting point because it is thought that effector-type cells have reached a terminal differentiation stage 16. Our findings suggest that these cells may also be targets for IFN-α-based therapy. The IFN-α effects on CD3/CD28-triggered
fold expansion vary depending on the CD8+ T-cell subpopulation. Whereas IFN-α enhances the expansion of naïve CD8+ T cells, it delays the proliferation of Ag-experienced cells. This is reminiscent of reports showing that IFN-α exerts opposing functions on the proliferation nearly depending on the cell type, the context of its action and/or the presence of other stimuli 5, 13, 25, 26. STAT1 seems to be mediating the direct anti-proliferative effects of IFN-I in mice 5, 27. It has been reported that Ag-triggered murine naïve CD8+ T cells down-regulate the levels of STAT1 to counter the anti-proliferative effect of IFN-I during viral infection 28. Ongoing experimentation will elucidate the role of STAT1 and other signaling molecules in the control of human CD8+ T-cell proliferation by IFN-α and its dichotomy of effects on naïve and memory cells.