There was SAHA HDAC ic50 no statistically significant evidence of heterogeneity (I 2 = 18.4%; P = 0.29). We investigated the effect of ART on the risk of CVD. We identified three relevant studies estimating the RR for ART compared with HIV-uninfected people [11, 17, 24]. Benito et al.  compared 80 HIV-infected people who were exposed to PI-based regimens with 256 uninfected people aged 19 to 49 years. The estimated RR of CVD was 2.40 (95% CI 1.69, 3.46) after adjusting for age, sex, blood pressure, diabetes, smoking, cholesterol and left ventricular hypertrophy. The study reported by Klein et al.  compared 6702 HIV-infected people who were exposed to PI and other ART regimens with uninfected people and estimated the RR of MI to be 1.78 (95% CI 1.43, 2.22). We conducted a meta-analysis on estimates
from these three studies (note that we included the RR for the HAART period from the Obel et al. study). The pooled RR of CVD among PLHIV with treatment was 2.00 (95% CI 1.70 to 2.37; P < 0.001) compared with HIV-uninfected people (Fig. 2b). There was no statistically significant evidence of heterogeneity (I 2 = 13.2%; P = 0.32). In summary, the risk of CVD is two times higher among ART-treated PLHIV than HIV-uninfected people. We also investigated the effect of ART on the risk of CVD among HIV-infected people with and without ART.
We identified eight relevant studies estimating the RR for various ART regimens compared with treatment-naïve PLHIV [7, 8, 12, see more 14, 20, 22, 23, 29]. Currier et al. reported that the hazard ratio of CHD associated with exposure to ART was 2.06 (95% CI 1.42, 2.99), which was adjusted for diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, renal failure and hypertension . Aboud et al. estimated the OR of CVD and CHD to be 1.13 (95% CI 0.72, 1.80) and 1.02 (95% CI 0.57, 1.85), respectively, for people exposed to ART when Amisulpride adjusted for age and gender . Bozzette et al. calculated an adjusted HR of serious cardiovascular events to be 1.22 (95% CI 0.77, 1.92) and 1.28 (95% CI 0.71, 2.30) among PLHIV who were exposed to NNRTI- and PI-based ART, respectively . Durand et al. estimated the OR of MI to be 1.74 (95% CI 1.18, 2.56), 1.60 (95% CI 1.06, 2.43) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.07, 2.12) among PLHIV who were exposed to abacavir, didanosine and stavudine, respectively, after adjusting for age and sex . Lang et al. calculated an adjusted OR of MI to be 2.01 (95% CI 1.11, 3.64) among PLHIV who were exposed to abacavir-based ART . Mary-Krause et al. estimated the adjusted relative hazard of MI to be 0.93 (95% CI 0.19, 4.65), 1.38 (95% CI 0.67, 2.83) and 2.56 (95% CI 1.03, 6.34) among PLHIV who were exposed to NRTI-, NNRTI- and PI-based ART, respectively . Obel et al. calculated an adjusted RR of MI to be 2.00 (95% CI 1.10, 3.