87; 97.5% CI, 0.73 to 1.04; P=0.08) and an unfavorable trend with low-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 1.13; 97.5% CI, 0.96 to 1.34; P=0.10). The annualized rate of major bleeding was 3.43% with warfarin versus 2.75% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91; P<0.001) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55; P<0.001). The corresponding annualized rates of death from cardiovascular causes were 3.17% versus 2.74% (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to selleck kinase inhibitor 0.97; P=0.01), and 2.71% (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96; P=0.008), and the corresponding rates of the key secondary end point (a composite
of stroke, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes) were 4.43% versus 3.85% (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.96; P=0.005), and 4.23% (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.05; P=0.32).
ConclusionsBoth once-daily regimens of edoxaban were noninferior to warfarin with respect to the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and were associated with significantly lower rates of bleeding and death from cardiovascular causes. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo
Pharma Development; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00781391.)”
“Zolpidem is a hypnotic drug that binds to gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors but lacks consistently demonstrable anxiolytic efficacy.
Rhesus monkeys (N = 4) were trained under a multiple schedule in which food-maintained responding was programmed (18-response fixed ratio) for a 5-min period, followed by a 5-min period in which the food-maintained SYN-117 responding was suppressed by response-contingent electric shock (20-response fixed ratio). Doses of zolpidem (range = 0.03 to 1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) were administered 5 min before
the session, and responding Succinyl-CoA was re-assessed at three additional 20-min intervals. A similar experiment also was carried out with the non-selective benzodiazepine, triazolam, over a dose range of 0.001 to 0.1 mg/kg, i.v.
Zolpidem did not engender a significant increase in average rates of suppressed responding at earlier time points; however, rates of non-suppressed responding were robustly decreased. At 45- and 65-min post-injection, zolpidem treatment resulted in a dose-dependent increase in rates of suppressed responding. In contrast, the non-selective benzodiazepine triazolam increased rates of suppressed responding in a dose-dependent manner at all four time points, although decreases in non-suppressed responding were less at the later time points.
These findings suggest that zolpidem has anxiolytic-like effects, but only > 25 min after i.v. injection in this rhesus monkey conflict model. It was hypothesized that time-dependent effects on the response rate-suppressing properties of zolpidem become tolerant (i.e., acute tolerance).