In the epidemiological context, the utilization of oral fluid to determine HAV protection has been demonstrated to be appropriate because of its advantages and high accuracy for surveillance studies in different rate groups [7], [8], [10], [14], [20], [21] and [22]. The advantages of oral specimen collection and testing and the performance of several oral fluid collection devices and modified EIAs
have led to increased interest in the utilization of oral fluid as a surrogate for serum samples. To be useful for HAV epidemiological studies and the screening of Veliparib in vitro groups with a high seroprevalence rate of anti-HAV antibodies, the EIAs originally designed for use on serum samples were modified to detect the antibodies in oral fluid; the levels of anti-HAV antibodies are lower in oral fluid than in serum. As a result, an improvement in the sensitivity and specificity of the assays using matched oral fluid and serum samples has been demonstrated in several studies [7], [8] and [10]. However, some studies have reported results of HAV testing in oral fluid collected from patients
during hepatitis A outbreaks, during which oral fluid is known to have higher titers of anti-HAV antibodies [6] and [10]. Thus, the optimization of EIAs for detecting anti-HAV antibodies in oral fluid collected during outbreaks does not appear to be appropriate to validate these GSI-IX in vitro assays for use in evaluating oral fluid anti-HAV levels associated with vaccine-induced immunity. Moreover, the optimal oral fluid collection device for the determination of anti-HAV status must be identified
because the commercial product used for specimen collection can affect the recovery of antibodies and thus yield a lower accuracy result [7], [8], [23] and [24]. In the present study and in accordance with a previous study, the use of oral fluid for anti-HAV antibody detection was optimized; the use of an oral fluid inhibitors sample without dilution is ideal for the detection of anti-HAV antibodies by a modified EIA [10]. The three commercial oral fluid collection devices yielded different values of sensitivity and specificity for the detection of anti-HAV Oxalosuccinic acid antibodies. The efficiency of oral fluid collection devices in extracting antibodies can be affected by the commercially available product used for their collection [24]. The levels of IgG anti-HAV-specific antibodies vary widely according to how immunity is acquired and the biological fluid assayed. Higher levels are detected in serum samples from patients recently infected with HAV than in oral fluid from vaccinated individuals [11]. The differences in the sensitivity rates found here could be partially explained by false-negative results from the OraSure® (2/25) and Salivette® (4/25) devices in the group of vaccinated individuals.