If a paracellular
marker was used in the assay to define the paracellular limit, deviation of the experimental data from this limitation could suggest presence of uptake mechanism(s) for the charged form of a compound. With pCEL-X analysis, naloxone and vinblastine showed such pH-dependent deviation in the present study. At physiological pH 7.4, both compounds are charged (cationic). Organic cation transport system could be involved in uptake of these compounds. Although it was not possible to detect uptake transport in the case of acetylsalicylic acid (nor was such a process reported in PD-332991 the literature for the molecule), a similar molecule, salicylic acid, the primary metabolite of acetylsalicylic acid, was found at high concentration in the
brain (Modulators brain-to-blood concentration ratio 1.06) after intraperitoneal injection of acetylsalicylic acid in mice ( Prins et al., 2009). Our finding of concentration-dependent permeation of naloxone is consistent with in vivo studies by Suzuki et al. (2010) reporting concentration-dependent uptake of naloxone in rat brains as measured by the Brain Uptake Index (BUI). The uptake mechanism is proposed to involve a pH-dependent cationic H1-antagonist transporter ( Suzuki et al., 2010). The results provide evidence that the combination of our in vitro BBB model from PBEC with detailed pKaFLUX analysis reaches the same selleckchem conclusion as in vivo studies, further validating the PBEC model and confirming its ability to predict in vivo BBB function. The intrinsic transcellular permeability P0 derived from measured Papp can reflect a purely transcellular passive permeation also or a combination of passive and carrier-mediated mechanism(s). While uptake of charged forms can be clearly revealed, specific
transport of the neutral form is not as easily recognized unless the assay is repeated to include transport inhibitors or unlabelled compounds to provide competition for uptake. A decrease in P0 in the presence of competing substrates suggests uptake mechanism(s) and an increase in P0 in the presence of inhibitors suggests that the compound may be subject to efflux mechanism(s). For ionizable compounds, if the assay is conducted at a single pH, uncertainty may arise in the analysis. The uncertainty derives from difficulty in determining the pKaFLUX or ‘bend in the curve’ when fitting all the parameters to the experimental data. One way to reduce the uncertainty is by defining at least one boundary, i.e., ABL or paracellular permeation, using appropriate markers. The method would be moderately demanding for screening purposes, but its value would be predictive information from pCEL-X before permeability experiments, helping to design experiments better, thus saving time and resources. Also, detailed data analysis in pCEL-X after experiments gives additional information and insights into permeability mechanisms.