There were no significant differences between the two target haem

There were no significant differences between the two target haemoglobin groups in the primary end-point (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53–1.14, P = 0.20), all-cause mortality selleck chemicals llc (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38–1.15, P = 0.14) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.33–1.70,

P = 0.48). In spite of having comparable haemoglobin target ranges, the results of the CREATE trial contrasted with those of the Normal Haematocrit Cardiac and CHOIR trials. The CREATE study population was relatively younger with less cardiovascular comorbidities, which could have partly explained the apparent disparity in the results. The median doses of erythropoietin administered in the CREATE trial were also considerably lower (5000 and 2000 IU/week in the normal and subnormal haemoglobin groups, respectively). These findings suggest that a high haemoglobin target per se may not have been directly responsible for the poorer observed outcomes if high doses of ESAs were avoided. The Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy study is the largest anaemia trial in CKD patients.10 In this trial, selleck products 4038 pre-dialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to darbepoetin to achieve a haemoglobin level of approximately 130 g/L or placebo. Darbepoetin was allowed in the placebo group

only as a rescue therapy when the haemoglobin level was less than 90 g/L. There were two primary end-points: (i) composite outcomes of death and non-fatal cardiovascular event; and (ii) composite outcomes of death and end-stage renal disease. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in death or non-fatal cardiovascular event (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.94–1.17, P = 0.41) and death or end-stage renal disease (HR 1.06, 0.95–1.19, P = 0.29). Also, the risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92–1.21, P = 0.48) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.88–1.25, P = 0.61) were comparable in both groups. Darbepoetin increased the risk of stroke compared with placebo (total 154 events, HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.38–2.68, P < 0.001). In contrast, the CHOIR

study did not show increased risk of 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl stroke in the high haemoglobin group. Age and prior history of stroke at baseline were similar in both the trials. However, the risk of developing stroke in the TREAT trial was more than double that in the CHOIR trial (3.8% vs 1.7%). All patients in the TREAT trial were diabetic, whereas nearly half of the CHOIR study population was diabetic. Because diabetes is a risk factor for stroke, this disparity in the proportion of diabetic patients may have explained disparity in the rates of stroke between the two trials. However, it does not explain the increased risk of stroke observed in the darbepoetin group. The TREAT study was a placebo-controlled double-blinded trial. The median doses of darbepoetin in the darbepoetin and placebo groups were 176 and 0 µg/month, respectively.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>