We recommend that surgeons continue with meticulous dissection of

We recommend that surgeons continue with meticulous dissection of any suspected retroperitoneal or retrocolic appendix. The use of advanced bipolar devices (e.g. Ligasure ™) or ultrasonic desiccation instruments (e.g. harmonic scalpel ™) might be of assistance if the appendix is severely inflamed.

HMPL-504 In addition, conversion to OA should be seriously considered when the patient shows signs of hemodynamic instability or when laparoscopic hemostatic methods fail to adequately expose and control the hemorrhage. References 1. Fingerhut A, Millat B, Borrie F: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide. World J Surg 1999, 23: 835–845.PubMedCrossRef 2. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al.: A BYL719 order prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 1994, 219 (6) : 725–8.PubMedCrossRef 3. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyo G, Graffner H, Hallerback MM-102 solubility dmso B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J,

Ringquist I, Sorensen S: Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 1999, 86: 48–53.PubMedCrossRef 4. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, et al.: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 2005, 242: 439–449.PubMed 5. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EAM: Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 1998, 383: 289–295.CrossRef 6. Eypasch E, Sauerland S, Lofering R, Neugebauer EAM: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense. Dig Surg 2002, 19: 518–522.PubMedCrossRef

7. Guloglu R, Dilege S, Aksoy M, et al.: Major retroperitoneal vascular injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2004, 14 (2) : 73–6.PubMedCrossRef 8. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et al.: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 2004, 239: 43–52.PubMedCrossRef 9. Sporn E, Petroski GF, Mancini GJ, et Thiamet G al.: Laparoscopic appendectomy–is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005. J Am Coll Surg 2009, 208 (2) : 179–85.PubMedCrossRef 10. Sandadi S, Johannigman JA, Wong VL, et al.: Recognition and Management of Major Vessel Injury during Laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010, 17 (6) : 692–702.PubMedCrossRef 11. Geers J, Holden C: Major vascular injury as a complication of laparoscopic surgery: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Am Surg 1996, 62 (5) : 377–9.PubMed 12. Fruhwirth J, Koch G, Mischinger HJ, et al.: Vascular complications in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997, 7 (3) : 251–4.PubMedCrossRef 13. Kaafarani HM, Hur K, Campasano M, et al.: Classification and valuation of postoperative complications in a randomized trial of open versus laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy. Hernia 2010, 14 (3) : 231–5.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>